Our Editorial Commitment
At CambridgeAnalytica.org, we are committed to publishing accurate, transparent,
and research-driven information that helps readers understand the evolving landscape of data privacy,
digital manipulation, algorithmic power, political targeting, cybersecurity, and AI governance.
Many of the topics we examine influence public awareness, policymaking, democratic processes,
and online safety. For this reason, we apply strict editorial standards rooted in clarity,
verification, and journalistic integrity.
Our Mission
Our mission is to deliver timely, relevant, and accessible analysis on data misuse,
surveillance systems, psychological profiling, digital rights, platform accountability,
misinformation, and the societal impact of algorithms.
We aim to inform citizens, educators, researchers, and policymakers — not to provide
legal, cybersecurity, political, medical, or financial advice.
Who Writes Our Content
All articles are produced by journalists, researchers, analysts, and editors specializing in
technology ethics, data governance, political communication, psychology of influence,
cybersecurity, and digital policy.
Each article is:
- Researched using verified international sources, academic publications, transparency reports,
regulatory documents, digital rights organizations, and investigative journalism. - Reviewed for accuracy, neutrality, and clarity before publication.
- Updated when new laws, disclosures, platform policies, or research findings emerge.
If an article does not include a specific author name, it has been written collaboratively
by the CambridgeAnalytica.org Editorial Team.
How We Choose Topics
We focus on issues that matter globally and directly affect digital citizens, including:
- Data privacy laws, surveillance practices, and regulatory frameworks
- Algorithmic bias, predictive analytics, and automated decision-making
- Psychological targeting, political microtargeting, and online manipulation
- Cybersecurity threats, digital risks, and platform accountability
- AI ethics, transparency, misinformation, and content moderation
- Societal impacts of emerging technologies
- Research on human behavior, attention economy, and digital psychology
- Historical and contemporary cases shaping tech governance
Our goal is to help readers understand these developments without speculation, exaggeration,
or bias — always with factual context and clarity.
Our Sources
We rely primarily on:
- Academic research and peer-reviewed studies
- Official regulatory agencies (EU, US, UK, international bodies)
- Digital rights and transparency organizations
- Platform policy documents and legal filings
- Investigative journalism and verified reports
- Public data from institutions such as the OECD, UN, World Bank, and independent research labs
Where possible, we include links to original sources so readers can verify information independently.
Corrections and Updates
If an article contains inaccurate or outdated information, we correct it promptly and add a
correction note with the date of modification.
Readers are invited to contact us if they believe a story requires clarification or review.
No Sensationalism or Clickbait
Although our headlines aim to be clear and engaging, we strictly avoid:
- Misleading or exaggerated claims
- Fear-based or speculative narratives
- Distorted interpretations of technical or political issues
All content is written with context, balance, and respect for verified facts.
Contact and Feedback
We welcome dialogue with readers, researchers, educators, and policymakers.
For questions, feedback, or corrections regarding our editorial process, please contact:
Thank You
Thank you for trusting CambridgeAnalytica.org — where technology meets integrity,
and where digital awareness empowers the public.